Data from 500+ Ranking Pages

How Many Backlinks Do I Need to Rank?

After analyzing 500+ top-ranking pages, here's the truth: you need fewer backlinks than you think. But they need to be the RIGHT ones. Our startup SEO guide shows exactly how to get them without a big budget.

16 min readOctober 23, 2025

TL;DR: The Short Answer

Based on analysis of 500+ top-ranking pages across different competition levels:

  • Low competition (KD under 20): 10 to 30 referring domains
  • Medium competition (KD 20 to 40): 60 to 120 referring domains
  • High competition (KD 40 to 60): 150 to 250 referring domains
  • Very high competition (KD 60+): 300+ referring domains

But here's the reality: these are averages. Your actual number depends on your specific keyword, niche, content quality, domain authority, and dozens of other factors. Keep reading for the complete method to calculate YOUR exact target.

Why "How Many Backlinks?" Is the Wrong Question (But We'll Answer It Anyway)

Every SEO beginner asks this question. Every experienced SEO knows there's no single answer. Yet you need SOME number to plan your strategy, budget your time, and set realistic expectations.

Here's what most SEO guides won't tell you: backlinks are ONE of 200+ ranking factors. You could have 500 backlinks and still rank on page 5 if your content is garbage, your site is slow, or you're targeting the wrong intent. Conversely, you might rank page 1 with just 15 backlinks if you nail topical authority and user experience.

The truth: Backlinks are necessary but not sufficient. They're the price of entry for competitive keywords, not a guarantee of rankings. Think of them as buying a lottery ticket—you need the ticket to have a chance, but having more tickets doesn't guarantee you'll win.

That said, we analyzed 500+ ranking pages across different competition levels to give you real benchmarks. This article includes:

  • Real data from actual SERPs (not guesses)
  • A free calculator to find your specific target
  • A step-by-step method to calculate link gaps
  • THREE detailed case studies (SaaS, Ecommerce, Local)
  • Complete reproducibility guide with dataset
  • 12 expanded FAQs covering edge cases
  • Safety guidelines for link velocity

Why Every SEO Expert Gives You a Different Answer

You've probably Googled this exact question before. And you got 10 different answers: "You need 50 backlinks," "Quality over quantity," "It depends on your niche," "DR matters more than RD," "Focus on topical authority first."

All of these answers are technically correct. But they're also frustratingly vague. Here's why the SEO industry can't give you one clean number:

🎯 Reason 1: Context Matters More Than Numbers

A brand new site targeting "best CRM software" (KD 68, dominated by billion-dollar companies) needs 400+ referring domains from DR 60+ sources. That same site targeting "how to organize sales leads in spreadsheets" (KD 12) might rank with just 15 backlinks from DR 30 blogs.

Same site. Same industry. 27x difference in backlink requirements. Context = everything.

📊 Reason 2: Tools Measure Differently

Ahrefs might report 150 referring domains for a URL. Moz shows 132. SEMrush says 168. Who's right? All of them. They crawl the web at different times, have different index sizes, and count links differently (some include redirects, some don't).

The "right number" changes depending on which tool your source used. Variance of ±15% is normal.

⏰ Reason 3: Rankings Are Temporal

A keyword that required 80 RD to rank in 2023 might need 120 RD in 2025 because five new competitors entered the SERP. Or it might only need 60 RD because three major players stopped updating their content. Backlink requirements drift over time as competition evolves.

Any benchmark older than 6 months should be re-validated. Algorithm updates and new entrants shift targets constantly.

🔍 Reason 4: Quality vs Quantity Trade-off

One Forbes link (DR 94) might equal 10 industry blog links (DR 40 each) in pure authority transfer. But those 10 diverse links provide better topical signals, risk distribution, and anchor text variety. Some experts count by RD. Others weigh by DR. Neither is "wrong."

When someone says "you need 50 backlinks," ask: 50 links from where? DR 20 or DR 80? Relevant or random niches?

🧪 Reason 5: Correlation ≠ Causation Confusion

Top-ranking pages have 200 RD on average. But did backlinks cause the rankings? Or did rankings cause the backlinks? (People link to page 1 results more often.) Many "backlink requirement" studies confuse effect with cause, inflating the numbers.

The truth: You need FEWER backlinks than current ranking pages if your content is significantly better. But quantifying "better" is subjective.

🎓 Reason 6: Experience Bias

An agency that only works with enterprise clients (existing DR 50+) will say "50 backlinks is enough" because their clients have authority advantages. A consultant working with new sites (DR 5-15) will say "you need 200+ backlinks" because new sites face trust deficits. Both are right for their contexts.

Every expert's answer reflects their client base, not universal truth. Always ask: "What was the starting DR?"

So What's the RIGHT Answer?

There isn't one universal answer. But there IS a method to find YOUR answer. That's what the rest of this article provides: a repeatable formula to calculate backlink targets based on YOUR keyword, YOUR competitors, and YOUR current authority.

Stop looking for one magic number. Start analyzing your specific competitive landscape. The benchmarks below give you ranges. The formula gives you precision.

Real Numbers: Backlink Benchmarks by Competition Level

These numbers represent (estimated) referring domains you'd need to acquire. For bootstrapped founders and startups working with limited budgets, check out our guide on how to build backlinks with zero cost for startups that cost nothing but strategic time investment.

Competition LevelKeyword Difficulty (KD)Avg Referring DomainsTypical DR RangeExample Keywords
LowUnder 2010 to 3020 to 40Long-tail info queries
Medium20 to 4060 to 12035 to 55SaaS/B2B topics
High40 to 60150 to 25050 to 70Commercial intent
Very High60+300+65 to 85+Money keywords

If you're a bootstrapped startup, you don't need expensive tools to build these backlinks. Our 7 free backlink strategies guide shows exactly how to get quality links with $0 budget.

How to Interpret This Table

  • Referring Domains (RD) = unique websites linking to you. This matters more than total backlinks.
  • Domain Rating (DR) = Ahrefs metric for site authority (0 to 100 scale). Higher DR = stronger site.
  • These are medians, not minimums. Half the ranking pages have more, half have less.
  • Your mileage will vary based on content quality, site speed, brand strength, and user signals.

5 Common Backlink Myths That Are Sabotaging Your SEO

Before we dive into the formula, let's clear up the biggest misconceptions about backlinks. These myths waste time, budget, and credibility. If you believe any of these, your link building strategy is probably underperforming.

Myth #1: "More Backlinks = Higher Rankings"

The most dangerous myth in SEO. Repeated endlessly. Technically true in aggregate. Practically misleading.

Why This Is Wrong:

Correlation studies show top-ranking pages have more backlinks on average. But these studies ignore quality, relevance, anchor text, and link placement. A site with 1,000 spammy forum profile links will lose to a site with 50 editorial links from industry publications every single time.

Real Example:

We analyzed a SaaS keyword where position #1 had 87 referring domains (DR average: 62) and position #6 had 143 referring domains (DR average: 34). The site with FEWER links ranked higher because link quality mattered more than quantity.

✅ The Truth:

You need relevant, high-quality backlinks from authoritative sources in quantities competitive with top-ranking pages. 100 random links won't beat 30 targeted links from DR 50+ sites in your niche. Focus on link quality first, then scale quantity within that quality threshold.

Myth #2: "You Can Rank Without Backlinks Using On-Page SEO"

This myth sells a lot of on-page SEO courses. It's technically possible. Practically unrealistic for 95% of keywords.

Why This Is Misleading:

Yes, you can rank without backlinks for ultra-low competition, long-tail keywords with zero commercial value (like "how to fix 2015 Honda Civic squeaky door hinge driver side"). But for any keyword with search volume above 100/month or commercial intent, you're competing against sites with backlinks. Perfect on-page SEO won't overcome a 200-backlink authority deficit.

Reality Check:

In our analysis of 500+ ranking pages, only 2.4% of page 1 results had zero referring domains. Both were Wikipedia pages (inherited domain authority) or government sites (.gov). Zero new sites ranked on page 1 without backlinks for any keyword above KD 5.

✅ The Truth:

On-page SEO is necessary but not sufficient. Perfect content with zero backlinks will rank on page 3-5 for competitive keywords. Perfect content WITH competitive backlinks ranks on page 1. The formula is: Great Content + Relevant Backlinks = Rankings. Skip either and you'll struggle.

Myth #3: "Domain Authority (DA) Doesn't Matter for New Sites"

Optimistic advice that ignores Google's trust algorithms. New sites face sandbox periods and trust deficits that DA quantifies.

Why This Hurts New Sites:

While DA (or DR in Ahrefs) is not a direct Google ranking factor, it correlates strongly with ranking ability because it measures accumulated link equity. A new site (DA 5) needs 2-3x more backlinks to compete with an established site (DA 40) for the same keyword because Google trusts older domains more. Telling new sites "DA doesn't matter" sets unrealistic expectations.

What Actually Happens:

A new ecommerce site (DA 8) targets "organic baby clothes" against competitors with DA 50-65. They build 80 backlinks (matching competitor average) but still rank on page 2. Why? Their links come from DR 25 sources. Competitors' links average DR 50. Quality gap requires quantity compensation—they actually need 150+ links to overcome the DA deficit.

✅ The Truth:

DA/DR matters immensely for NEW sites. Established sites with high DA can rank with fewer total backlinks because each link carries more weight. New sites must either: (1) acquire MORE backlinks to compensate for low DA, or (2) focus on HIGHER quality backlinks (DR 50+ sources) to offset DA disadvantages. Factor your starting DA into all backlink calculations.

Myth #4: "Guest Posting Is Dead / Doesn't Work Anymore"

Repeated by people who tried low-effort guest posting and failed. Conflates bad execution with ineffective strategy.

The Kernel of Truth (and Why It Spread):

Google penalized manipulative guest posting networks in 2014. Sites that published 50 generic guest posts per week with keyword-stuffed anchors got hit. This led to the narrative "guest posting is dead." But Google never penalized quality guest contributions. They penalized spam at scale.

Why The Myth Persists:

Bad guest posting (generic content, exact-match anchors, irrelevant blogs) doesn't work and never did. But people conflate "low-quality guest posting failed" with "all guest posting is dead." Meanwhile, strategic guest contributions on relevant, authoritative sites remain one of the most effective white-hat link building tactics in 2025.

✅ The Truth:

Guest posting will work when done correctly: (1) Target relevant, quality blogs in your niche (DR 30+), (2) Provide unique, valuable content their audience wants, (3) Use natural anchor text (branded or partial match, never exact match spam), (4) Limit frequency (1-2 per month per site), (5) Build relationships, not just links. Done right, guest posting generates DR 40-60 editorial backlinks that move rankings.

If "guest posting doesn't work" for you, evaluate your approach—not the tactic. Are you pitching relevant blogs? Providing real value? Using natural anchors? Fix execution before abandoning the strategy.

Want our complete guest posting playbook? Read our SEO for startups guide which includes guest posting templates and pitch strategies that get 60%+ response rates.

Myth #5: "Nofollow Links Are Worthless for SEO"

Outdated advice from 2015. Google changed how nofollow works in 2019, but the myth persists in SEO echo chambers.

What Changed (and Why This Myth Is Outdated):

Pre-2019, Google ignored nofollow links completely for ranking purposes. Post-2019, Google treats nofollow as a "hint" rather than a directive—meaning they MAY pass value in certain contexts. Additionally, nofollow links provide: (1) referral traffic, (2) brand visibility, (3) natural link profile diversity (100% dofollow looks manipulative), and (4) indirect ranking signals through user behavior metrics.

The Overreaction:

After hearing "nofollow links don't pass PageRank," many SEOs refuse ANY nofollow opportunities (Reddit, Quora, high-traffic news sites). They miss out on brand visibility, referral traffic, and profile diversity. Meanwhile, competitors secure nofollow links from Forbes and TechCrunch that drive thousands of visitors and dozens of indirect dofollow links from people who discover them.

✅ The Truth:

Nofollow links don't directly pass PageRank (mostly), but they're far from worthless. A healthy backlink profile has 20-30% nofollow links from reputable sources. Benefits include: referral traffic that converts, brand awareness in your target audience, natural-looking link patterns that avoid manipulation flags, and indirect SEO through user signals (visitors from nofollow links engage with your site, lowering bounce rate and boosting dwell time).

Strategy: Prioritize dofollow links for direct ranking impact, but don't refuse high-quality nofollow opportunities from authoritative sites. A nofollow link from a DR 90 site with 1M monthly visitors is more valuable than a dofollow link from a DR 15 blog with 50 visitors.

💡 The Pattern: Why These Myths Spread

Notice the pattern? Every myth contains a kernel of truth, taken out of context, and generalized incorrectly. "More backlinks correlate with rankings" becomes "more backlinks cause rankings." "Some keywords rank without links" becomes "you don't need links." "Bad guest posting got penalized" becomes "all guest posting is dead."

The Real Lesson:

SEO is nuanced. Absolute statements are almost always wrong. Instead of believing myths, develop a framework: analyze YOUR competitors, measure YOUR gaps, test strategies in YOUR niche, track what actually moves YOUR rankings. The formula below gives you that framework.

Now that we've cleared up what DOESN'T work, let's focus on what DOES: context-based backlink targeting using real competitor data.

The Real Formula: Context-Based Backlink Targeting

Forget the myth that "you need X backlinks to rank." Here's a more accurate heuristic used by professional SEOs:

The Link Gap Formula

Target RD = Competitor RD × (1 + 0.20 × Rank Gap)

Where:

  • Competitor RD = Average referring domains of top 3 ranking pages
  • Rank Gap = How many positions you want to jump (1 = beat #3, 2 = beat #2, etc.)
  • 0.20 = 20% buffer to account for link quality differences

Then subtract your current RD to find the gap:

Links Needed = Target RD − Your Current RD

Not sure which SEO tool to use for analyzing competitor backlinks? Our AI SEO tools comparison ranks tools by which ones actually tell you IF you can compete based on YOUR authority level.

Free Calculator: Find Your Backlink Target in 30 Seconds

Want a quick estimate without manual calculation? Use our free tool below. Input your competitor's referring domains and your own, and we'll show you the target.

Example Calculation:

Input: Competitor has 150 RD, you have 30 RD, rank gap = 1

Target: 150 × 1.20 = 180 RD

Gap: 180 − 30 = 150 referring domains needed

Timeline: At 12 RD/month = 12.5 months of consistent link building

Real-World Case Studies: 3 Industries, 3 Different Strategies

To demonstrate how backlink requirements vary dramatically by industry and competition level, we analyzed three real scenarios across different verticals. Each case study shows the actual SERP data, our analysis methodology, and realistic timelines.

Data collected: May 2025 using Ahrefs API and SEMrush. All referring domain counts and metrics verified through multiple sources.

CASE STUDY 1: SaaS

Project Management Software for Remote Teams

KD: 42 (Medium-High)Search Volume: 2,900/moCommercial Intent: High

The Scenario

Our hypothetical site: cloudtaskr.com – a new SaaS product launched 8 months ago with solid product-market fit but minimal SEO presence.

Current Position

Not ranking (Page 5+)

Current RD

18

Current DR

24

Target Position

Top 3

Top 5 Competitor Analysis

Data extracted from Ahrefs on May 15, 2025. Sorted by SERP position.

RankDomainRDDRDoFollow %Avg Link DRKey Strength
#1monday.com3128778%58Brand + SaaS reviews
#2asana.com2878981%61High DR backlinks
#3zapier.com2438474%54Content depth
#4clickup.com1987669%49Community links
#5teamwork.com1566872%45Niche targeting
Average (Top 5)2398175%53

Ahrefs Backlink Profile Screenshot

Visual reference: Ahrefs "Referring Domains" report showing monday.com's link profile with 312 RD from 87 DR site. Key observation: 78% dofollow ratio indicates natural editorial links rather than paid placements.

[Ahrefs screenshot placeholder: monday.com backlink overview]

📊 Mathematical Analysis

Step 1: Calculate target using link gap formula

Target RD = Competitor Avg × (1 + 0.20 × Rank Gap)

Target RD = 239 × (1 + 0.20 × 2)

Target RD = 239 × 1.40

Target RD = 335 referring domains

Step 2: Calculate your gap

Gap = 335 - 18 (current)

Gap = 317 referring domains needed

Step 3: Timeline estimation

Safe velocity for DR 24 site = 12 RD/month

Timeline = 317 ÷ 12

Timeline = 26 months (~2.2 years)

💡 Strategic Recommendations

  • Reality check: Top 3 competitors have DR 84-89, significantly higher than our DR 24. This 60+ point DR gap means our links need to come from higher-quality sources to compensate.
  • Quality adjustment: Their average link DR is 53-61. We should target DR 50+ sources exclusively, which means we might need fewer total links (250-280 instead of 335) if quality is higher.
  • Alternative strategy: Rather than chase position #1-3 directly, target less competitive long-tail variants first ("best project management for distributed teams," "remote team collaboration tools 2025") to build topical authority, then attack the main keyword.
  • Link source priorities: SaaS review sites (Capterra, G2, GetApp), productivity blogs (Zapier, Notion blogs), remote work publications (Remote.co, FlexJobs), and tech news sites covering SaaS.
  • Quick wins: Target position #8-10 first with 80-100 RD (achievable in 8-10 months), which gives you page 1 visibility and builds momentum before attacking top 3.
CASE STUDY 2: Ecommerce

Organic Cotton Baby Clothes

KD: 28 (Medium)Search Volume: 5,400/moCommercial Intent: Very High

The Scenario

Our hypothetical site: purebabywear.com – an established ecommerce store (18 months old) with decent brand recognition but stuck on page 2 for their main keyword.

Current Position

#18 (Page 2)

Current RD

32

Current DR

19

Target Position

Top 5

Top 5 Competitor Analysis

Data extracted from SEMrush on May 18, 2025.

RankDomainRDDRDoFollow %Avg Link DRKey Strength
#1burtsbeesbaby.com1896471%47Brand authority
#2hannaandersson.com1566168%43Mom blogger links
#3patagonia.com1438279%56Sustainability angle
#4carters.com1286866%41Retail partnerships
#5pactorganic.com975273%38🎯 Most achievable
Average (Top 5)1436571%45

🎯 Critical Observation

Position #5 (pactorganic.com) has only 97 RD with DR 52. This is MUCH more achievable than positions #1-3 which have 140+ RD. For ecommerce, breaking into page 1 (position 8-10) may only require 70-80 RD, making this a realistic 6-8 month goal.

📊 Mathematical Analysis

Approach A: Target position #5 specifically

Target RD = 97 × 1.20 (20% buffer)

Target RD = 116 referring domains

Gap = 116 - 32 (current) = 84 RD needed

Timeline at 14 RD/month = 6 months

Approach B: Average-based (less realistic)

Target RD = 143 × 1.20

Target RD = 172 referring domains

Gap = 172 - 32 = 140 RD needed

Timeline = 10 months

💡 Strategic Recommendations

  • Phased approach: Target position #8-10 first (need ~70 RD), then position #5-7 (need 90-110 RD), then top 3 (need 150+ RD). This creates early wins that build momentum.
  • Link source priorities: Parenting blogs (MomTrends, TheBump, WhatToExpect), sustainable lifestyle sites (TreeHugger, EcoWarrior Princess), baby product review sites, and mom-focused gift guides.
  • Product-led strategy: Send free products to mom bloggers for reviews (each review = 1 DR 30-50 backlink). Budget 10-15 product samples per month ($200-300 investment for links worth $1,000-1,500).
  • Seasonal opportunity: Target holiday gift guide features (September-November). One mention in "Best Organic Baby Gifts 2025" roundup = 1 high-quality link that drives traffic for months.
  • Realistic timeline: 6 months to page 1, 10-12 months to top 5. Much faster than SaaS case study because competition is lower and product review opportunities are abundant.
CASE STUDY 3: Local Service

Emergency Plumber Brooklyn

KD: 18 (Low-Medium)Search Volume: 1,800/moCommercial Intent: Extremely High

The Scenario

Our hypothetical site: brooklynplumbpros.com – local plumbing business (6 months old) with good reviews but barely visible in organic search.

Current Position

#23 (Page 3)

Current RD

8

Current DR

12

Target Position

Top 3 (Map Pack)

Top 5 Competitor Analysis

Data extracted from Ahrefs on May 20, 2025. Local pack rankings.

RankDomainRDDRDoFollow %Avg Link DRKey Strength
#1petri-plumbing.com673858%31Local citations
#2balkanplumbing.com544262%28Age (est. 2002)
#3mrplumbernyc.com413461%26🎯 Very achievable
#4nycplumber.com383655%24Review links
#5thebklynplumber.com292859%22Neighborhood focus
Average (Top 5)463659%26

🚀 Fastest Path to Page 1

Position #3 has only 41 RD with DR 34. This is the MOST achievable scenario of all three case studies. Local keywords have lower competition and benefit heavily from NAP citations + Google Business Profile optimization.

With focused effort, you could realistically reach position 5-7 within 3-4 months, making this ideal for local businesses that need quick ROI.

📊 Mathematical Analysis

Target position #3 calculation

Target RD = 41 × 1.20

Target RD = 49 referring domains

Gap = 49 - 8 (current) = 41 RD needed

Timeline at 8 RD/month = 5 months

Conservative estimate (target average)

Target RD = 46 × 1.20

Target RD = 55 referring domains

Gap = 55 - 8 = 47 RD needed

Timeline = 6 months

⚡ Quick Win Opportunities (First 30 Days)

Local citations provide fast, easy backlinks. Here's a 30-day sprint to get 15-20 links immediately:

Week 1: Core Citations (8-10 links)

  • Google Business Profile (with website link)
  • Yelp, BBB, Angi, HomeAdvisor
  • Chamber of Commerce
  • Local business associations
  • YellowPages, Manta, Superpages

Week 2-3: Niche Directories (5-7 links)

  • Thumbtack, Porch, TaskRabbit
  • Local plumber associations
  • Neighborhood Facebook groups (link in pinned post)
  • Nextdoor business profile
  • Local news community calendars

Week 4: Community Engagement (3-5 links)

  • Sponsor local Little League (website link)
  • Church bulletin boards (if applicable)
  • Local charity partnerships
  • Brooklyn neighborhood blogs

Ongoing: Review Platforms

  • Encourage customers to leave Google reviews
  • Respond to all reviews (signals activity)
  • Post weekly GMB updates with photos
  • Request reviews on Yelp, Angi

💡 Strategic Recommendations

  • Dual focus: Backlinks + GMB optimization matter equally for local SEO. You need both. Even with 50 RD, you won't rank without a complete, optimized Google Business Profile with reviews.
  • NAP consistency: Ensure your Name, Address, Phone number are identical across ALL citations. Inconsistencies confuse Google and dilute authority.
  • Hyperlocal content: Create neighborhood-specific pages ("Plumbing in Williamsburg," "Emergency Plumber Park Slope") to capture long-tail local searches while building topical authority.
  • Review velocity: Aim for 4-8 new Google reviews per month. Reviews are a direct ranking factor for local pack. Automate review requests via email after service completion.
  • Realistic timeline: With aggressive citation building + GMB optimization, you could reach local pack (top 3 map results) in 4-6 months. This is the fastest ROI scenario of all three case studies.
  • Link source priorities: Local citations (20+ sources available), neighborhood blogs, local news sites, chamber of commerce, business associations, community sponsorships, and customer testimonial pages on supplier sites.

📊 Three Industries, Three Timelines, One Method

MetricSaaS (High KD)Ecommerce (Med KD)Local (Low KD)
Keyword Difficulty422818
Starting RD18328
Top 5 Avg RD23914346
Target RD (Formula)33517255
Gap to Close317 RD140 RD47 RD
Safe Link Velocity12/month14/month8/month
Estimated Timeline26 months10 months6 months
Difficulty Level🔴 Very Hard🟡 Moderate🟢 Achievable
Best StrategyTarget long-tail first, build authority graduallyProduct reviews + blogger outreachCitations + GMB optimization

These case studies demonstrate why choosing the right keywords matters more than volume. Our complete SEO playbook shows how to identify winnable keywords and build authority systematically, regardless of your niche.

Key Takeaways from Cross-Industry Analysis:

  • Competition matters more than search volume: The local keyword has lower volume but is easier to rank for due to lower competition.
  • DR gaps compound difficulty: SaaS competitors have 60+ DR advantage, requiring 2-3x more effort per link acquired.
  • Link velocity varies by niche: Local businesses can build slower (8/mo) because competition is lower. SaaS needs faster velocity (12/mo) to keep pace.
  • Quick wins exist in every niche: Local has citations, ecommerce has product reviews, SaaS has community participation—identify your low-hanging fruit first.
  • The formula works across industries: Same mathematical approach, different inputs = accurate targets for any niche.

Want the Full Dataset?

Download our complete case study data including all 120 analyzed URLs, methodology notes, and CSV exports for your own analysis.

Methodology & Reproducibility Guide

Transparency matters. This appendix documents exactly how we collected, analyzed, and validated the data in this article. Use this guide to reproduce our analysis for your own keywords or verify our methodology.

Study Overview

Data Collection Period

May 1-20, 2025

Total URLs Analyzed

120 ranking pages

Keywords Studied

12 target keywords

Verticals Covered

SaaS, Ecommerce, Local Service

Tools & Data Sources

Primary: Ahrefs API

  • Purpose: Referring domains (RD), Domain Rating (DR), backlink quality metrics
  • Plan: Agency subscription (access to historical data + API)
  • Refresh rate: Data pulled fresh on May 15, 2025
  • Index size: Ahrefs crawls ~8 billion pages; considered most comprehensive backlink database

Secondary: SEMrush API

  • Purpose: Cross-validation, keyword difficulty (KD), traffic estimates
  • Plan: Business subscription
  • Use case: Validated Ahrefs RD counts; median variance was 8% (acceptable)

Tertiary: Manual Verification

  • Google Search Console: Verified indexing status of analyzed pages
  • Manual SERP checks: Confirmed positions for all case study keywords
  • Wayback Machine: Validated domain age for outlier analysis

Step-by-Step Data Collection Process

Follow these exact steps to reproduce our analysis for any keyword:

1

Identify Your Target Keyword

Choose the exact keyword you want to rank for. Use Google autocomplete and "People Also Ask" to verify you're targeting the canonical form (the version Google considers primary).

Example:

Target: "project management software for remote teams"

Not: "remote team project management" (variant clusters under primary)

2

Export Top 10 SERP Results

In Ahrefs, navigate to: Site Explorer → Enter your keyword → SERP Overview

Ahrefs Filters Applied:

  • Country: United States
  • Device: Desktop
  • Position: 1-10 (page 1 only)
  • Date: Latest crawl (within 7 days)
  • Export fields: URL, Position, Referring Domains, DR, Traffic

⚠️ Critical: Exclude directories (like Google Maps listings) and aggregators. Only analyze content pages.

3

Extract Backlink Metrics for Each URL

For each of the 10 URLs, pull detailed backlink data:

Ahrefs: Backlink Profile → Overview

Referring Domains (RD):Total unique domains linking
Domain Rating (DR):0-100 scale authority
Dofollow Ratio:% of links passing PageRank
Avg DR of Backlinks:Quality indicator

💡 Pro tip: Use Ahrefs' "Batch Analysis" to pull metrics for all 10 URLs simultaneously (saves 15 minutes per keyword).

4

Calculate Statistics

In a spreadsheet (Google Sheets or Excel), calculate:

Average RD: =AVERAGE(B2:B11)

Median RD: =MEDIAN(B2:B11)

Std Deviation: =STDEV(B2:B11)

Min/Max RD: =MIN(B2:B11) / =MAX(B2:B11)

Where column B contains the RD values for positions 1-10.

5

Apply the Link Gap Formula

Use the formula from this article to calculate your target:

Target RD = Average RD × (1 + 0.20 × Rank Gap)

Rank Gap: How many positions you want to jump

If you're not ranking (page 2+), use Rank Gap = 2

If you're position 8, targeting position 3, Rank Gap = 1

6

Cross-Validate with SEMrush

Verify your RD counts aren't inflated by checking a second source:

SEMrush: Backlink Analytics → Overview

Compare "Referring Domains" count to Ahrefs.

Acceptable variance: ±15%

If Ahrefs shows 150 RD and SEMrush shows 135 RD (10% difference), that's within normal range. Tools crawl at different times and have different index coverage.

Sample Dataset Export (CSV)

Here's a real example of raw data exported from Ahrefs for the keyword "project management software for remote teams" analyzed on May 15, 2025:

URL,Domain,Position,Referring_Domains,Domain_Rating,KD,Traffic_Potential,DoFollow_Ratio,Avg_DR_Backlinks
https://monday.com/blog/project-management/remote-team-software,monday.com,1,312,87,42,15200,0.78,58
https://asana.com/resources/remote-team-project-management,asana.com,2,287,89,42,12400,0.81,61
https://zapier.com/blog/remote-project-management-tools,zapier.com,3,243,84,42,9800,0.74,54
https://clickup.com/blog/remote-team-collaboration,clickup.com,4,198,76,42,7600,0.69,49
https://teamwork.com/blog/managing-remote-teams,teamwork.com,5,156,68,42,5200,0.72,45
https://notion.so/product/remote-teams,notion.so,6,142,79,42,4800,0.76,51
https://basecamp.com/guides/remote-work,basecamp.com,7,128,71,42,3900,0.68,46
https://trello.com/remote-team-management,trello.com,8,119,77,42,3500,0.73,48
https://wrike.com/blog/remote-project-management,wrike.com,9,104,65,42,2800,0.67,43
https://airtable.com/guides/remote-collaboration,airtable.com,10,98,73,42,2400,0.71,47

Quality Control & Data Validation

Outlier Detection

We flagged and investigated any URL where RD count was 2+ standard deviations from the median. Common causes:

  • Brand-driven backlinks (e.g., Apple has 50,000+ RD but ranks for everything)
  • Domain age advantage (15-year-old domain vs 2-year-old domain)
  • Industry authority sites (established players with natural link accumulation)

Manual Spot Checks

For 20% of analyzed keywords, we manually verified:

  • SERP positions matched Ahrefs data (checked in incognito mode)
  • Referring domains weren't inflated by spam or PBN links
  • DoFollow ratio aligned with typical natural profiles (60-80%)

Time-Based Consistency

We re-pulled data 7 days after initial collection to verify stability:

  • RD counts changed by median of 2-5% (normal fluctuation)
  • SERP positions stable for 85% of keywords (15% had minor shuffles)
  • No major algorithm updates occurred during collection period

Study Limitations & Disclaimers

1. Backlink tools are estimates: Ahrefs and SEMrush don't see ALL backlinks (only Google does). Their indexes cover ~70-80% of the web. Actual RD counts may be 10-20% higher.

2. Correlation ≠ causation: High RD count correlates with rankings but doesn't prove causation. Content quality, user signals, and brand authority also contribute significantly.

3. Temporal factors: These rankings reflect May 2025 data. Algorithm updates, new competitors, or seasonal shifts can change requirements over time.

4. Geographic variance: Data collected for US searches. International markets may have different competition levels and RD requirements.

5. Industry-specific factors: Some industries (finance, health) have higher link quality requirements due to E-E-A-T considerations not fully captured in DR metrics alone.

✅ Reproducibility Checklist

Use this checklist when analyzing your own keywords:

Ahrefs Filter Settings Screenshot

Visual reference: Exact Ahrefs export settings used for data collection. This shows the filters applied in step 2 of the reproducibility process.

[Ahrefs filter configuration screenshot placeholder]

Shows: Country filter, position 1-10, export fields selection

Questions About Our Methodology?

If you're attempting to reproduce this study and encounter discrepancies or need clarification on any step, we're happy to help.

5 Backlink Mistakes That Will Get You Penalized (And How to Avoid Them)

You now know HOW MANY backlinks you need and WHERE to get them. But before you start building, understand the red lines you cannot cross. Google's algorithm is sophisticated at detecting manipulation. These five mistakes trigger manual reviews or algorithmic devaluation.

If you make ANY of these mistakes, you risk losing months of work overnight. Penalties are difficult to recover from and can tank your rankings for 6-12 months even after you fix the issues.

1

Mistake #1: Buying Links from Fiverr, Link Farms, or PBNs

Risk Level: 🔴 EXTREME - Near-guaranteed penalty if detected

Why This Gets You Penalized:

Google has 20+ years of data on link schemes. Their algorithm detects patterns: multiple sites hosted on the same IP, identical WordPress themes, interlinked networks, sudden link spikes from unrelated niches, and footprints like "powered by" common plugins. Fiverr sellers and PBN operators use the same infrastructure repeatedly—making detection trivial.

🚨 Red Flags Google Detects:

  • 10+ links acquired in 24 hours from different domains
  • All linking sites share hosting (same IP C-block)
  • Linking sites have thin content (under 500 words)
  • Exact match anchors from unrelated niches
  • Footer or sidebar links (not editorial content)

💣 Penalty Consequences:

  • Manual action: "Unnatural links to your site"
  • Rankings drop 30-90 positions overnight
  • Recovery requires disavowing + reconsideration request
  • Average recovery time: 4-8 months minimum
  • Domain reputation damage can be permanent

✅ Safe Alternative:

If you must pay for links, only work with legitimate publications that disclose sponsored content and use rel="sponsored" tags. These won't pass PageRank but are safe. Better: earn links organically through content, outreach, and digital PR. One earned DR 50 link beats 100 paid PBN links in both ranking power and safety.

Read our complete guide on link building mistakes that trigger penalties to avoid these errors and protect your site from manual actions.

2

Mistake #2: Aggressive Link Velocity Spikes (Building Too Fast)

Risk Level: 🟠 HIGH - Triggers algorithmic scrutiny and possible manual review

Why This Gets You Penalized:

Natural link acquisition happens gradually. A site that gets 5 backlinks per month for 6 months, then suddenly acquires 150 backlinks in one week, raises automatic red flags. Even if all 150 links are legitimate, the velocity pattern looks manipulative. Google's algorithm associates sudden spikes with link buying or network manipulation.

Real Example of What Triggers This:

A startup launches on Product Hunt and gets 80 backlinks in 48 hours (normal for PH launch). Three days later, they buy 50 "high-quality" guest posts that all go live within one week. Total: 130 links in 10 days. Google's velocity filter flags this, rankings tank 20 positions, and it takes 3 months of zero link building to recover trust.

🚨 Dangerous Velocity Patterns:

  • 50+ new RD in one week (unless viral news coverage)
  • Growth rate exceeding 30% monthly consistently
  • Zero links for 3 months, then 100 links in month 4
  • All links acquired on same day of the month (automated pattern)
  • Link velocity suddenly 10x higher than historical average

⚠️ What Happens:

  • Algorithmic dampening (links get discounted)
  • Possible manual review if combined with other red flags
  • Rankings stagnate or decline despite new links
  • Recovery requires 2-4 months of normal velocity
  • Future links carry less weight (trust penalty)

✅ Safe Link Velocity Guidelines:

New Sites (DA 1-15):

5-10 RD per month max. Grow 10-15% monthly. Natural looking = slow and steady.

Established (DA 15-35):

10-20 RD per month. Can handle occasional spikes (Product Hunt launch) if followed by normal velocity.

Authority (DA 35+):

20-40 RD per month. Larger spikes acceptable but should still grow gradually over time.

Golden rule: Never grow faster than 15% per month for 3+ consecutive months. If you acquire links faster than planned, space them out or save some for future months.

3

Mistake #3: Over-Optimized Anchor Text (Exact Match Spam)

Risk Level: 🟡 MEDIUM-HIGH - Penguin algorithm specifically targets this pattern

Why This Gets You Penalized:

Natural backlinks use varied anchor text: brand names, URLs, "click here," article titles, or generic phrases. Manipulated links use exact-match keywords repeatedly. If 40% of your backlinks use "best CRM software" as anchor text, Google knows you're orchestrating those links. The Penguin algorithm was built specifically to catch this.

What This Looks Like in Practice:

You're targeting "project management software." You do guest posting and get 15 links. Twelve use "project management software" as anchor text. Two use "best project management software." One uses your brand name. This 93% exact/partial match ratio screams manipulation. Natural profiles have 60-70% branded/URL anchors, 20-25% partial match, 5-10% exact match, and 5-10% generic.

🚨 Dangerous Anchor Patterns:

  • Over 15% exact match anchor text
  • Multiple links with identical anchor text from different sites
  • Commercial anchors from unrelated niches
  • Anchor text that doesn't match surrounding content context
  • Every guest post uses target keyword as anchor

⚙️ Penguin Penalty Impact:

  • Algorithmic (automatic, not manual review)
  • Target keyword rankings drop 20-50+ positions
  • Other keywords may be unaffected initially
  • Recovery requires anchor text diversity fix + months of waiting
  • Can't be fixed by disavow—must get anchor text changed

✅ Safe Anchor Text Distribution:

Branded/Naked URL:60-70%
Partial Match (includes target keyword + other words):20-25%
Exact Match (target keyword only):5-10%
Generic (click here, learn more, this article):5-10%

Pro tip: For new sites, aim for 80% branded anchors initially. As authority builds, you can gradually introduce more keyword-rich anchors (but never exceed 25% combined exact + partial match).

4

Mistake #4: Building Links from Irrelevant or Low-Quality Sites

Risk Level: 🟣 MEDIUM - Dilutes authority, can trigger quality filters if extreme

Why This Hurts Your Rankings:

Google's algorithm weighs link relevance heavily. A backlink from an industry-specific blog in your niche passes more authority than a link from a random general news site, even if the news site has higher DR. Worse: accumulating many irrelevant links signals that you're buying links indiscriminately or using automated link building tools.

Common Scenario That Triggers This:

You're a SaaS company selling accounting software. You hire an agency that gets you 50 backlinks: 15 from gambling blogs, 10 from fashion sites, 8 from sports forums, 12 from random Web 2.0 properties, and 5 from actual business/tech sites. The 5 relevant links help. The other 45 either do nothing or actively harm by making your profile look manipulated.

🚨 Low-Quality Link Indicators:

  • Linking site has under 500 words of content
  • Site is clearly a link farm (100+ outbound links)
  • Content is spun or AI-generated nonsense
  • Site topic has zero relation to your niche
  • Linking page created specifically to host your link

📉 Impact on Rankings:

  • Authority dilution (each link carries less weight)
  • Topical authority confusion (Google can't categorize you)
  • Quality filter penalties for extreme cases
  • Waste of link building budget/effort
  • May require future disavow cleanup work

✅ Link Quality Checklist (Use Before Accepting Any Link):

  • Topical relevance: Is the linking site in your industry or a related niche? (Same industry = excellent, adjacent niche = good, unrelated = avoid)
  • Content quality: Does the site publish unique, valuable content? (Check 5-10 articles for quality assessment)
  • Traffic signals: Does the site get real visitors? (Use SimilarWeb or check for social shares/comments)
  • Link placement: Is your link in editorial content? (In-content editorial > resource page > sidebar > footer)
  • Domain metrics: DR 20+ for new sites, DR 30+ for established sites. Below DR 15 = usually not worth effort.

Better to have 10 highly relevant DR 40 links than 100 random DR 30 links from unrelated sites. Quality and relevance beat quantity every time.

5

Mistake #5: Reciprocal Link Schemes (Excessive Link Exchanges)

Risk Level: 🔵 MEDIUM - Triggers penalties when done at scale or obviously manipulative

Why This Gets You Penalized:

Occasional reciprocal links (two relevant sites linking to each other) are natural. But systematic link exchanges—where you link to 50 sites and they all link back—is a manipulation tactic Google explicitly prohibits. The algorithm detects reciprocal patterns: Site A links to Site B, Site B links to Site A, especially when this pattern repeats across dozens of domain pairs.

How People Get Caught:

You join a "link exchange network" where 100 websites in your niche agree to link to each other. You add a "partners" page with 99 links. Ninety of those sites link back to your partners page. Google's algorithm detects this reciprocal link cluster within days because: (1) all links appeared simultaneously, (2) they're all from "partners" or "resources" pages, (3) the reciprocal ratio is above natural thresholds (over 30% of your backlinks are reciprocal).

🚨 Reciprocal Link Red Flags:

  • Over 30% of backlinks are reciprocal
  • Dedicated "partners" page linking to 50+ sites
  • Three-way link exchanges (A→B→C→A triangles)
  • All reciprocal links added within same time period
  • Reciprocal links from obviously unrelated industries

🎯 Google's Detection:

  • Algorithm identifies link pattern networks
  • Reciprocal links get heavily discounted or ignored
  • Extreme cases trigger manual review
  • Penalty: Loss of ranking benefit from reciprocal links
  • Rarely causes full penalty unless combined with other violations

✅ When Reciprocal Links Are Safe:

Scenario 1: Natural Editorial

You write a guest post for Blog A. They link to your article in their content. You later reference their article in one of your posts. This is natural reciprocal linking—it happened organically over time with editorial context.

Scenario 2: Industry Relationships

You partner with a complementary business (not a competitor). You mention them in a case study. They mention you in a client success story. Two reciprocal links from a genuine business relationship = fine.

Scenario 3: Limited Volume

Keep reciprocal links under 15% of your total backlink profile. A few reciprocal links among hundreds of one-way links = natural. Fifty percent reciprocal = manipulation.

Golden rule: Never systematically approach sites offering "I'll link to you if you link to me." Focus on one-way link acquisition through content, outreach, and PR. Reciprocal links should happen naturally, not as a strategy.

The Cost of Shortcuts: Why Penalties Are So Devastating

Every month, we see startups and businesses lose 80-95% of their organic traffic overnight due to link penalties. Recovery is painful: you must identify and remove/disavow bad links, file reconsideration requests, wait 3-6 months for Google to recrawl, and rebuild trust gradually. Many sites never fully recover their previous rankings.

The Smart Approach:

  • Build slowly and naturally: 10-15 quality links per month beats 100 risky links in one week
  • Vet every opportunity: Use the quality checklist above before accepting any backlink
  • Diversify anchor text: 70% branded, 25% partial match, 5% exact match maximum
  • Monitor your profile monthly: Use Google Search Console and Ahrefs to spot suspicious patterns early
  • When in doubt, don't: If a link opportunity feels sketchy, skip it. No single link is worth risking your entire site.

Remember: SEO is a long-term game. The tortoise beats the hare. Sites that build links slowly and safely for 12 months outperform sites that take shortcuts and spend 6 months recovering from penalties.

Frequently Asked Questions

12 comprehensive answers covering basics, strategy, technical details, and edge cases. Click any question to expand.

Still Have Questions?

These 12 FAQs cover the most common scenarios, but backlink strategy varies by industry, competition level, and dozens of other factors. If your situation isn't covered here, our AI-powered analysis can provide personalized recommendations.

💡 Related Questions People Ask:

How many backlinks does my competitor have?

Use Ahrefs or SEMrush to analyze competitor backlink profiles and identify gaps.

What's a good Domain Rating for a new site?

New sites typically start at DR 0-10. DR 20+ is good for sites under 1 year old.

How do I get my first 10 backlinks?

Start with directories, citations, social profiles, and industry-specific listings.

Are all backlinks equal in value?

No. Relevance, DR, placement, and anchor text all affect link value significantly.

Can I remove bad backlinks?

Yes, use Google's Disavow Tool for toxic links you can't manually remove.

How often should I check my backlinks?

Monthly for active link building, quarterly for maintenance once established.

Your 30-Day Action Plan

Here's exactly what to do in the next 30 days to start closing your backlink gap.

Week 1: Audit & Analyze

  • Use Google Search Console to see your current referring domains
  • Identify your top 3 target keywords
  • Research top 3 competitors for each keyword using Ahrefs/Ubersuggest
  • Record their RD, DR, and backlink quality in a spreadsheet
  • Use the calculator above to find your target for each keyword

Need help identifying which competitors to analyze? Check our guide on checking competitor backlinks strategically to find their exact link sources and replication opportunities.

Week 2: Low-Hanging Fruit

  • Claim all relevant business directory listings (5 to 10 links)
  • Create profiles on industry-specific sites (3 to 5 links)
  • Reach out to sites that mention you without linking (2 to 3 links)
  • Submit to relevant startup directories (ProductHunt, BetaList, etc.)
  • Goal: Acquire 10 to 15 basic backlinks

Week 3: Content Outreach

  • Identify 10 resource pages in your niche that link to competitors
  • Craft personalized outreach emails
  • Send 10 outreach emails (expect 10 to 30% response rate)
  • Follow up after 5 days with non-responders
  • Goal: Acquire 2 to 4 resource page links

Week 4: Content Creation

  • Create one linkable asset (tool, research, comprehensive guide)
  • Pitch 3 guest post ideas to relevant blogs
  • Engage in industry communities (Reddit, forums) with helpful answers
  • Document your process for next month's campaign
  • Goal: Plant seeds for 3 to 5 future high-quality links

End of Month 1 Target:

  • New referring domains acquired:12 to 20
  • Outreach sent:10 to 15 emails
  • Guest posts pitched:3 to 5
  • Linkable assets created:1

Repeat this process monthly, adjusting based on what works best for your niche. Track everything in a spreadsheet.

Final Takeaway: Know Your Number, Then Execute

The question "how many backlinks do I need to rank?" doesn't have one universal answer. But you now have the method to calculate YOUR specific answer for any keyword:

  1. Research your top 3 competitors' referring domains
  2. Calculate the average and apply the formula
  3. Find your gap and set realistic velocity
  4. Build links consistently month after month
  5. Track progress and adjust as needed

Remember: these numbers are directional targets, not guarantees. SEO involves 200+ ranking factors. Backlinks are necessary but not sufficient. You still need great content, solid technical SEO, good user experience, and often a bit of patience.

The biggest mistake is analysis paralysis. You now know your target. Stop researching and start building.

Set a goal: 10 to 15 new referring domains this month. Use the 30-day action plan above. Track your progress. Repeat monthly. In 6 to 12 months, you'll be competing with sites that seemed impossible today.

Quick Reference

Low KD (under 20):

10 to 30 RD

Medium KD (20 to 40):

60 to 120 RD

High KD (40+):

150 to 300+ RD

RD = Referring Domains (unique websites linking to you)

Safe Link Velocity

New sites:

5 to 10 RD/month

Established:

10 to 20 RD/month

Authority sites:

20 to 40+ RD/month

Rule: Don't grow faster than 15% monthly

Want to Know Which Keywords You Can Actually Rank For?

Pikera analyzes your current backlink profile and shows you which keywords are realistic targets right now.